Scalable Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Network Potentials: Promise and Pitfalls

December 15, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Stephan Thaler, Gregor Doehner, Julija Zavadlav arXiv ID 2212.07959 Category physics.chem-ph Cross-listed cs.LG, physics.comp-ph Citations 28 Venue Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
Neural network (NN) potentials promise highly accurate molecular dynamics (MD) simulations within the computational complexity of classical MD force fields. However, when applied outside their training domain, NN potential predictions can be inaccurate, increasing the need for Uncertainty Quantification (UQ). Bayesian modeling provides the mathematical framework for UQ, but classical Bayesian methods based on Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) are computationally intractable for NN potentials. By training graph NN potentials for coarse-grained systems of liquid water and alanine dipeptide, we demonstrate here that scalable Bayesian UQ via stochastic gradient MCMC (SG-MCMC) yields reliable uncertainty estimates for MD observables. We show that cold posteriors can reduce the required training data size and that for reliable UQ, multiple Markov chains are needed. Additionally, we find that SG-MCMC and the Deep Ensemble method achieve comparable results, despite shorter training and less hyperparameter tuning of the latter. We show that both methods can capture aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty reliably, but not systematic uncertainty, which needs to be minimized by adequate modeling to obtain accurate credible intervals for MD observables. Our results represent a step towards accurate UQ that is of vital importance for trustworthy NN potential-based MD simulations required for decision-making in practice.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” physics.chem-ph

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Machine learning for molecular simulation

Frank NoΓ©, Alexandre Tkatchenko, ... (+2 more)

physics.chem-ph πŸ› Annual review of physical chemistry (Print) πŸ“š 759 cites 6 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted