A Permutation-Free Kernel Independence Test
December 18, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Journal of machine learning research
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Shubhanshu Shekhar, Ilmun Kim, Aaditya Ramdas
arXiv ID
2212.09108
Category
stat.ME
Cross-listed
cs.LG,
math.ST,
stat.ML
Citations
17
Venue
Journal of machine learning research
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
In nonparametric independence testing, we observe i.i.d.\ data $\{(X_i,Y_i)\}_{i=1}^n$, where $X \in \mathcal{X}, Y \in \mathcal{Y}$ lie in any general spaces, and we wish to test the null that $X$ is independent of $Y$. Modern test statistics such as the kernel Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) and Distance Covariance (dCov) have intractable null distributions due to the degeneracy of the underlying U-statistics. Thus, in practice, one often resorts to using permutation testing, which provides a nonasymptotic guarantee at the expense of recalculating the quadratic-time statistics (say) a few hundred times. This paper provides a simple but nontrivial modification of HSIC and dCov (called xHSIC and xdCov, pronounced ``cross'' HSIC/dCov) so that they have a limiting Gaussian distribution under the null, and thus do not require permutations. This requires building on the newly developed theory of cross U-statistics by Kim and Ramdas (2020), and in particular developing several nontrivial extensions of the theory in Shekhar et al. (2022), which developed an analogous permutation-free kernel two-sample test. We show that our new tests, like the originals, are consistent against fixed alternatives, and minimax rate optimal against smooth local alternatives. Numerical simulations demonstrate that compared to the full dCov or HSIC, our variants have the same power up to a $\sqrt 2$ factor, giving practitioners a new option for large problems or data-analysis pipelines where computation, not sample size, could be the bottleneck.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β stat.ME
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Performance Metrics (Error Measures) in Machine Learning Regression, Forecasting and Prognostics: Properties and Typology
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
External Validity: From Do-Calculus to Transportability Across Populations
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifiers with Bounded Error Levels
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimization
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Comparison of Bayesian predictive methods for model selection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted