Excluding Single-Crossing Matching Minors in Bipartite Graphs

December 19, 2022 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Archontia C. Giannopoulou, Dimitrios M. Thilikos, Sebastian Wiederrecht arXiv ID 2212.09348 Category math.CO: Combinatorics Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 4 Venue ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
\noindent By a seminal result of Valiant, computing the permanent of $(0,1)$-matrices is, in general, $\#\mathsf{P}$-hard. In 1913 Pรณlya asked for which $(0,1)$-matrices $A$ it is possible to change some signs such that the permanent of $A$ equals the determinant of the resulting matrix. In 1975, Little showed these matrices to be exactly the biadjacency matrices of bipartite graphs excluding $K_{3,3}$ as a \{matching minor}. This was turned into a polynomial time algorithm by McCuaig, Robertson, Seymour, and Thomas in 1999. However, the relation between the exclusion of some matching minor in a bipartite graph and the tractability of the permanent extends beyond $K_{3,3}.$ Recently it was shown that the exclusion of any planar bipartite graph as a matching minor yields a class of bipartite graphs on which the {permanent} of the corresponding $(0,1)$-matrices can be computed efficiently. In this paper we unify the two results above into a single, more general result in the style of the celebrated structure theorem for single-crossing-minor-free graphs. We identify a class of bipartite graphs strictly generalising planar bipartite graphs and $K_{3,3}$ which includes infinitely many non-Pfaffian graphs. The exclusion of any member of this class as a matching minor yields a structure that allows for the efficient evaluation of the permanent. Moreover, we show that the evaluation of the permanent remains $\#\mathsf{P}$-hard on bipartite graphs which exclude $K_{5,5}$ as a matching minor. This establishes a first computational lower bound for the problem of counting perfect matchings on matching minor closed classes.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Combinatorics

๐Ÿ”ฎ ๐Ÿ”ฎ The Ethereal

Tables of subspace codes

Daniel Heinlein, Michael Kiermaier, ... (+2 more)

math.CO ๐Ÿ› arXiv ๐Ÿ“š 94 cites 10 years ago