Deterministic counting LovΓ‘sz local lemma beyond linear programming

December 30, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Kun He, Chunyang Wang, Yitong Yin arXiv ID 2212.14847 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DM, math.PR Citations 10 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We give a simple combinatorial algorithm to deterministically approximately count the number of satisfying assignments of general constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). Suppose that the CSP has domain size $q=O(1)$, each constraint contains at most $k=O(1)$ variables, shares variables with at most $Ξ”=O(1)$ constraints, and is violated with probability at most $p$ by a uniform random assignment. The algorithm returns in polynomial time in an improved local lemma regime: \[ q^2\cdot k\cdot p\cdotΞ”^5\le C_0\quad\text{for a suitably small absolute constant }C_0. \] Here the key term $Ξ”^5$ improves the previously best known $Ξ”^7$ for general CSPs [JPV21b] and $Ξ”^{5.714}$ for the special case of $k$-CNF [JPV21a, HSW21]. Our deterministic counting algorithm is a derandomization of the very recent fast sampling algorithm in [HWY22]. It departs substantially from all previous deterministic counting LovΓ‘sz local lemma algorithms which relied on linear programming, and gives a deterministic approximate counting algorithm that straightforwardly derandomizes a fast sampling algorithm, hence unifying the fast sampling and deterministic approximate counting in the same algorithmic framework. To obtain the improved regime, in our analysis we develop a refinement of the $\{2,3\}$-trees that were used in the previous analyses of counting/sampling LLL. Similar techniques can be applied to the previous LP-based algorithms to obtain the same improved regime and may be of independent interests.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted