STARS-ISAC: How Many Sensors Do We Need?

January 09, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Zheng Zhang, Yuanwei Liu, Zhaolin Wang, Jian Chen arXiv ID 2301.03436 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Cross-listed eess.SP Citations 32 Venue IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
A simultaneously transmitting and reflecting surface (STARS) enabled integrated sensing and communications (ISAC) framework is proposed, where a novel bi-directional sensing-STARS architecture is devised to facilitate the full-space communication and sensing. Based on the proposed framework, a joint optimization problem is formulated, where the Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) for estimating the 2-dimension direction-of-arrival of the sensing target is minimized. Two cases are considered for sensing performance enhancement. 1) For the two-user case, an alternating optimization algorithm is proposed. In particular, the maximum number of deployable sensors is obtained in the closed-form expressions. 2) For the multi-user case, an extended CRB (ECRB) metric is proposed to characterize the impact of the number of sensors on the sensing performance. Based on the proposed metric, a novel penalty-based double-loop (PDL) algorithm is proposed to solve the ECRB minimization problem. To tackle the coupling of the ECRB, a general decoupling approach is proposed to convert it to a tractable weighted linear summation form. Simulation results reveal that 1) the proposed PDL algorithm can achieve a near-optimal performance with consideration of sensor deployment; 2) without violating the communication under the quality of service requirements, reducing the receive antennas at the BS does not deteriorate the sensing performance; and 3) it is preferable to deploy more passive elements than sensors in terms of achieving optimal sensing performance
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted