Zero-shot Clarifying Question Generation for Conversational Search
January 30, 2023 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ The Web Conference
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Zhenduo Wang, Yuancheng Tu, Corby Rosset, Nick Craswell, Ming Wu, Qingyao Ai
arXiv ID
2301.12660
Category
cs.IR: Information Retrieval
Cross-listed
cs.CL
Citations
30
Venue
The Web Conference
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
A long-standing challenge for search and conversational assistants is query intention detection in ambiguous queries. Asking clarifying questions in conversational search has been widely studied and considered an effective solution to resolve query ambiguity. Existing work have explored various approaches for clarifying question ranking and generation. However, due to the lack of real conversational search data, they have to use artificial datasets for training, which limits their generalizability to real-world search scenarios. As a result, the industry has shown reluctance to implement them in reality, further suspending the availability of real conversational search interaction data. The above dilemma can be formulated as a cold start problem of clarifying question generation and conversational search in general. Furthermore, even if we do have large-scale conversational logs, it is not realistic to gather training data that can comprehensively cover all possible queries and topics in open-domain search scenarios. The risk of fitting bias when training a clarifying question retrieval/generation model on incomprehensive dataset is thus another important challenge. In this work, we innovatively explore generating clarifying questions in a zero-shot setting to overcome the cold start problem and we propose a constrained clarifying question generation system which uses both question templates and query facets to guide the effective and precise question generation. The experiment results show that our method outperforms existing state-of-the-art zero-shot baselines by a large margin. Human annotations to our model outputs also indicate our method generates 25.2\% more natural questions, 18.1\% more useful questions, 6.1\% less unnatural and 4\% less useless questions.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Information Retrieval
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendation
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systems
๐
๐
Old Age
Neural Graph Collaborative Filtering
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendation
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Prediction
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted