Do Random and Chaotic Sequences Really Cause Different PSO Performance?
February 09, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π GECCO Companion
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Paul Moritz NΓΆrenberg, Hendrik Richter
arXiv ID
2303.14099
Category
physics.soc-ph
Cross-listed
cs.NE
Citations
2
Venue
GECCO Companion
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Our topic is performance differences between using random and chaos for particle swarm optimization (PSO). We take random sequences with different probability distributions and compare them to chaotic sequences with different but also with same density functions. This enables us to differentiate between differences in the origin of the sequences (random number generator or chaotic nonlinear system) and statistical differences expressed by the underlying distributions. Our findings (obtained by evaluating the PSO performance for various benchmark problems using statistical hypothesis testing) cast considerable doubt on previous results which compared random to chaos and suggested that the choice leads to intrinsic differences in performance.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β physics.soc-ph
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Networks beyond pairwise interactions: structure and dynamics
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Statistical physics of human cooperation
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Vital nodes identification in complex networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Influence maximization in complex networks through optimal percolation
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Scale-free networks are rare
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted