When to be Discrete: Analyzing Algorithm Performance on Discretized Continuous Problems

April 25, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors AndrΓ© Thomaser, Jacob de Nobel, Diederick Vermetten, Furong Ye, Thomas BΓ€ck, Anna V. Kononova arXiv ID 2304.13117 Category cs.NE: Neural & Evolutionary Cross-listed math.OC Citations 9 Venue Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
The domain of an optimization problem is seen as one of its most important characteristics. In particular, the distinction between continuous and discrete optimization is rather impactful. Based on this, the optimizing algorithm, analyzing method, and more are specified. However, in practice, no problem is ever truly continuous. Whether this is caused by computing limits or more tangible properties of the problem, most variables have a finite resolution. In this work, we use the notion of the resolution of continuous variables to discretize problems from the continuous domain. We explore how the resolution impacts the performance of continuous optimization algorithms. Through a mapping to integer space, we are able to compare these continuous optimizers to discrete algorithms on the exact same problems. We show that the standard $(ΞΌ_W, Ξ»)$-CMA-ES fails when discretization is added to the problem.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Neural & Evolutionary

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey

Klaus Greff, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, ... (+3 more)

cs.NE πŸ› IEEE TNNLS πŸ“š 6.0K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted