Improved Stabilizer Estimation via Bell Difference Sampling

April 27, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Symposium on the Theory of Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sabee Grewal, Vishnu Iyer, William Kretschmer, Daniel Liang arXiv ID 2304.13915 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.CC, cs.DS Citations 43 Venue Symposium on the Theory of Computing Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We study the complexity of learning quantum states in various models with respect to the stabilizer formalism and obtain the following results: - We prove that $Ξ©(n)$ $T$-gates are necessary for any Clifford+$T$ circuit to prepare computationally pseudorandom quantum states, an exponential improvement over the previously known bound. This bound is asymptotically tight if linear-time quantum-secure pseudorandom functions exist. - Given an $n$-qubit pure quantum state $|ψ\rangle$ that has fidelity at least $Ο„$ with some stabilizer state, we give an algorithm that outputs a succinct description of a stabilizer state that witnesses fidelity at least $Ο„- \varepsilon$. The algorithm uses $O(n/(\varepsilon^2Ο„^4))$ samples and $\exp\left(O(n/Ο„^4)\right) / \varepsilon^2$ time. In the regime of $Ο„$ constant, this algorithm estimates stabilizer fidelity substantially faster than the naΓ―ve $\exp(O(n^2))$-time brute-force algorithm over all stabilizer states. - In the special case of $Ο„> \cos^2(Ο€/8)$, we show that a modification of the above algorithm runs in polynomial time. - We exhibit a tolerant property testing algorithm for stabilizer states. The underlying algorithmic primitive in all of our results is Bell difference sampling. To prove our results, we establish and/or strengthen connections between Bell difference sampling, symplectic Fourier analysis, and graph theory.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Variational Quantum Algorithms

M. Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, ... (+9 more)

quant-ph πŸ› Nature Reviews Physics πŸ“š 3.3K cites 5 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted