CAMEL: Co-Designing AI Models and Embedded DRAMs for Efficient On-Device Learning
May 04, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Sai Qian Zhang, Thierry Tambe, Nestor Cuevas, Gu-Yeon Wei, David Brooks
arXiv ID
2305.03148
Category
cs.AR: Hardware Architecture
Cross-listed
cs.LG,
cs.NE
Citations
9
Venue
International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
On-device learning allows AI models to adapt to user data, thereby enhancing service quality on edge platforms. However, training AI on resource-limited devices poses significant challenges due to the demanding computing workload and the substantial memory consumption and data access required by deep neural networks (DNNs). To address these issues, we propose utilizing embedded dynamic random-access memory (eDRAM) as the primary storage medium for transient training data. In comparison to static random-access memory (SRAM), eDRAM provides higher storage density and lower leakage power, resulting in reduced access cost and power leakage. Nevertheless, to maintain the integrity of the stored data, periodic power-hungry refresh operations could potentially degrade system performance. To minimize the occurrence of expensive eDRAM refresh operations, it is beneficial to shorten the lifetime of stored data during the training process. To achieve this, we adopt the principles of algorithm and hardware co-design, introducing a family of reversible DNN architectures that effectively decrease data lifetime and storage costs throughout training. Additionally, we present a highly efficient on-device training engine named \textit{CAMEL}, which leverages eDRAM as the primary on-chip memory. This engine enables efficient on-device training with significantly reduced memory usage and off-chip DRAM traffic while maintaining superior training accuracy. We evaluate our CAMEL system on multiple DNNs with different datasets, demonstrating a $2.5\times$ speedup of the training process and $2.8\times$ training energy savings than the other baseline hardware platforms.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Hardware Architecture
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Corona: System Implications of Emerging Nanophotonic Technology
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A scalable multi-core architecture with heterogeneous memory structures for Dynamic Neuromorphic Asynchronous Processors (DYNAPs)
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
SpAtten: Efficient Sparse Attention Architecture with Cascade Token and Head Pruning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Neural Cache: Bit-Serial In-Cache Acceleration of Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
SpArch: Efficient Architecture for Sparse Matrix Multiplication
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted