Towards Optimizing Storage Costs on the Cloud
May 24, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Koyel Mukherjee, Raunak Shah, Shiv Kumar Saini, Karanpreet Singh, Khushi, Harsh Kesarwani, Kavya Barnwal, Ayush Chauhan
arXiv ID
2305.14818
Category
cs.DB: Databases
Citations
7
Venue
IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
We study the problem of optimizing data storage and access costs on the cloud while ensuring that the desired performance or latency is unaffected. We first propose an optimizer that optimizes the data placement tier (on the cloud) and the choice of compression schemes to apply, for given data partitions with temporal access predictions. Secondly, we propose a model to learn the compression performance of multiple algorithms across data partitions in different formats to generate compression performance predictions on the fly, as inputs to the optimizer. Thirdly, we propose to approach the data partitioning problem fundamentally differently than the current default in most data lakes where partitioning is in the form of ingestion batches. We propose access pattern aware data partitioning and formulate an optimization problem that optimizes the size and reading costs of partitions subject to access patterns. We study the various optimization problems theoretically as well as empirically, and provide theoretical bounds as well as hardness results. We propose a unified pipeline of cost minimization, called SCOPe that combines the different modules. We extensively compare the performance of our methods with related baselines from the literature on TPC-H data as well as enterprise datasets (ranging from GB to PB in volume) and show that SCOPe substantially improves over the baselines. We show significant cost savings compared to platform baselines, of the order of 50% to 83% on enterprise Data Lake datasets that range from terabytes to petabytes in volume.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Databases
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Untangling Blockchain: A Data Processing View of Blockchain Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Converting Static Image Datasets to Spiking Neuromorphic Datasets Using Saccades
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
BLOCKBENCH: A Framework for Analyzing Private Blockchains
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Data Synthesis based on Generative Adversarial Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
HoloClean: Holistic Data Repairs with Probabilistic Inference
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted