Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: on the Perspective of Trade-off

June 25, 2023 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› ACM Computing Surveys

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Huiqiang Chen, Tianqing Zhu, Tao Zhang, Wanlei Zhou, Philip S. Yu arXiv ID 2306.14123 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CR, cs.CY Citations 78 Venue ACM Computing Surveys Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) has been a hot topic in recent years. Ever since it was introduced, researchers have endeavored to devise FL systems that protect privacy or ensure fair results, with most research focusing on one or the other. As two crucial ethical notions, the interactions between privacy and fairness are comparatively less studied. However, since privacy and fairness compete, considering each in isolation will inevitably come at the cost of the other. To provide a broad view of these two critical topics, we presented a detailed literature review of privacy and fairness issues, highlighting unique challenges posed by FL and solutions in federated settings. We further systematically surveyed different interactions between privacy and fairness, trying to reveal how privacy and fairness could affect each other and point out new research directions in fair and private FL.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted