Computing Star Discrepancies with Numerical Black-Box Optimization Algorithms

June 29, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors FranΓ§ois ClΓ©ment, Diederick Vermetten, Jacob de Nobel, Alexandre D. Jesus, LuΓ­s Paquete, Carola Doerr arXiv ID 2306.16998 Category cs.NE: Neural & Evolutionary Citations 8 Venue Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
The $L_{\infty}$ star discrepancy is a measure for the regularity of a finite set of points taken from $[0,1)^d$. Low discrepancy point sets are highly relevant for Quasi-Monte Carlo methods in numerical integration and several other applications. Unfortunately, computing the $L_{\infty}$ star discrepancy of a given point set is known to be a hard problem, with the best exact algorithms falling short for even moderate dimensions around 8. However, despite the difficulty of finding the global maximum that defines the $L_{\infty}$ star discrepancy of the set, local evaluations at selected points are inexpensive. This makes the problem tractable by black-box optimization approaches. In this work we compare 8 popular numerical black-box optimization algorithms on the $L_{\infty}$ star discrepancy computation problem, using a wide set of instances in dimensions 2 to 15. We show that all used optimizers perform very badly on a large majority of the instances and that in many cases random search outperforms even the more sophisticated solvers. We suspect that state-of-the-art numerical black-box optimization techniques fail to capture the global structure of the problem, an important shortcoming that may guide their future development. We also provide a parallel implementation of the best-known algorithm to compute the discrepancy.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Neural & Evolutionary

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey

Klaus Greff, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, ... (+3 more)

cs.NE πŸ› IEEE TNNLS πŸ“š 6.0K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted