Topology-Aware Resilient Routing Protocol for FANETs: An Adaptive Q-Learning Approach
June 30, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Internet of Things Journal
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yanpeng Cui, Qixun Zhang, Zhiyong Feng, Zhiqing Wei, Ce Shi, Heng Yang
arXiv ID
2306.17360
Category
cs.NI: Networking & Internet
Cross-listed
eess.SP
Citations
70
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Flying ad hoc networks (FANETs) play a crucial role in numerous military and civil applications since it shortens mission duration and enhances coverage significantly compared with a single unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Whereas, designing an energy-efficient FANET routing protocol with a high packet delivery rate (PDR) and low delay is challenging owing to the dynamic topology changes. In this article, we propose a topology-aware resilient routing strategy based on adaptive Q-learning (TARRAQ) to accurately capture topology changes with low overhead and make routing decisions in a distributed and autonomous way. First, we analyze the dynamic behavior of UAV nodes via the queuing theory, and then the closed-form solutions of neighbors' change rate (NCR) and neighbors' change interarrival time (NCIT) distribution are derived. Based on the real-time NCR and NCIT, a resilient sensing interval (SI) is determined by defining the expected sensing delay of network events. Besides, we also present an adaptive Q-learning approach that enables UAVs to make distributed, autonomous, and adaptive routing decisions, where the above SI ensures that the action space can be updated in time at a low cost. The simulation results verify the accuracy of the topology dynamic analysis model and also prove that our TARRAQ outperforms the Q-learning-based topology-aware routing (QTAR), mobility prediction-based virtual routing (MPVR), and greedy perimeter stateless routing based on energy-efficient hello (EE-Hello) in terms of 25.23%, 20.24%, and 13.73% lower overhead, 9.41%, 14.77%, and 16.70% higher PDR, and 5.12%, 15.65%, and 11.31% lower energy consumption, respectively.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Networking & Internet
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
π
π
The Cartographer
Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Survey of Important Issues in UAV Communication Networks
π
π
The Cartographer
Network Function Virtualization: State-of-the-art and Research Challenges
π
π
The Cartographer
Applications of Deep Reinforcement Learning in Communications and Networking: A Survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted