The Looming Threat of Fake and LLM-generated LinkedIn Profiles: Challenges and Opportunities for Detection and Prevention
July 21, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Navid Ayoobi, Sadat Shahriar, Arjun Mukherjee
arXiv ID
2307.11864
Category
cs.SI: Social & Info Networks
Cross-listed
cs.CL,
cs.CR,
cs.LG
Citations
46
Venue
ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
In this paper, we present a novel method for detecting fake and Large Language Model (LLM)-generated profiles in the LinkedIn Online Social Network immediately upon registration and before establishing connections. Early fake profile identification is crucial to maintaining the platform's integrity since it prevents imposters from acquiring the private and sensitive information of legitimate users and from gaining an opportunity to increase their credibility for future phishing and scamming activities. This work uses textual information provided in LinkedIn profiles and introduces the Section and Subsection Tag Embedding (SSTE) method to enhance the discriminative characteristics of these data for distinguishing between legitimate profiles and those created by imposters manually or by using an LLM. Additionally, the dearth of a large publicly available LinkedIn dataset motivated us to collect 3600 LinkedIn profiles for our research. We will release our dataset publicly for research purposes. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first large publicly available LinkedIn dataset for fake LinkedIn account detection. Within our paradigm, we assess static and contextualized word embeddings, including GloVe, Flair, BERT, and RoBERTa. We show that the suggested method can distinguish between legitimate and fake profiles with an accuracy of about 95% across all word embeddings. In addition, we show that SSTE has a promising accuracy for identifying LLM-generated profiles, despite the fact that no LLM-generated profiles were employed during the training phase, and can achieve an accuracy of approximately 90% when only 20 LLM-generated profiles are added to the training set. It is a significant finding since the proliferation of several LLMs in the near future makes it extremely challenging to design a single system that can identify profiles created with various LLMs.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Social & Info Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Natural Scales in Geographical Patterns
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applications
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The COVID-19 Social Media Infodemic
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networks
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted