Consistent Query Answering for Primary Keys on Path Queries

September 26, 2023 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Paraschos Koutris, Xiating Ouyang, Jef Wijsen arXiv ID 2309.15270 Category cs.DB: Databases Citations 10 Venue ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We study the data complexity of consistent query answering (CQA) on databases that may violate the primary key constraints. A repair is a maximal consistent subset of the database. For a Boolean query $q$, the problem $\mathsf{CERTAINTY}(q)$ takes a database as input, and asks whether or not each repair satisfies $q$. It is known that for any self-join-free Boolean conjunctive query $q$, $\mathsf{CERTAINTY}(q)$ is in $\mathbf{FO}$, $\mathbf{LSPACE}$-complete, or $\mathbf{coNP}$-complete. In particular, $\mathsf{CERTAINTY}(q)$ is in $\mathbf{FO}$ for any self-join-free Boolean path query $q$. In this paper, we show that if self-joins are allowed, the complexity of $\mathsf{CERTAINTY}(q)$ for Boolean path queries $q$ exhibits a tetrachotomy between $\mathbf{FO}$, $\mathbf{NL}$-complete, $\mathbf{PTIME}$-complete, and $\mathbf{coNP}$-complete. Moreover, it is decidable, in polynomial time in the size of the query~$q$, which of the four cases applies.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Databases

R.I.P. ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted

Datasheets for Datasets

Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, ... (+5 more)

cs.DB ๐Ÿ› CACM ๐Ÿ“š 2.6K cites 8 years ago

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted