PsyCoT: Psychological Questionnaire as Powerful Chain-of-Thought for Personality Detection

October 31, 2023 ยท Entered Twilight ยท ๐Ÿ› Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

๐Ÿ’ค TWILIGHT: Eternal Rest
Repo abandoned since publication

Repo contents: README.md, data, personality_psycot_essays.ipynb, personality_psycot_kaggle.ipynb, personality_standard_essays.ipynb, personality_standard_kaggle.ipynb

Authors Tao Yang, Tianyuan Shi, Fanqi Wan, Xiaojun Quan, Qifan Wang, Bingzhe Wu, Jiaxiang Wu arXiv ID 2310.20256 Category cs.CL: Computation & Language Citations 46 Venue Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Repository https://github.com/TaoYang225/PsyCoT โญ 28 Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, have showcased remarkable zero-shot performance across various NLP tasks. However, the potential of LLMs in personality detection, which involves identifying an individual's personality from their written texts, remains largely unexplored. Drawing inspiration from Psychological Questionnaires, which are carefully designed by psychologists to evaluate individual personality traits through a series of targeted items, we argue that these items can be regarded as a collection of well-structured chain-of-thought (CoT) processes. By incorporating these processes, LLMs can enhance their capabilities to make more reasonable inferences on personality from textual input. In light of this, we propose a novel personality detection method, called PsyCoT, which mimics the way individuals complete psychological questionnaires in a multi-turn dialogue manner. In particular, we employ a LLM as an AI assistant with a specialization in text analysis. We prompt the assistant to rate individual items at each turn and leverage the historical rating results to derive a conclusive personality preference. Our experiments demonstrate that PsyCoT significantly improves the performance and robustness of GPT-3.5 in personality detection, achieving an average F1 score improvement of 4.23/10.63 points on two benchmark datasets compared to the standard prompting method. Our code is available at https://github.com/TaoYang225/PsyCoT.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computation & Language

๐ŸŒ… ๐ŸŒ… Old Age

Attention Is All You Need

Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, ... (+6 more)

cs.CL ๐Ÿ› NeurIPS ๐Ÿ“š 166.0K cites 8 years ago