Perceptions and Detection of AI Use in Manuscript Preparation for Academic Journals

November 19, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› PLoS ONE

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Nir Chemaya, Daniel Martin arXiv ID 2311.14720 Category cs.CY: Computers & Society Cross-listed cs.AI, econ.GN Citations 37 Venue PLoS ONE Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
The emergent abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), which power tools like ChatGPT and Bard, have produced both excitement and worry about how AI will impact academic writing. In response to rising concerns about AI use, authors of academic publications may decide to voluntarily disclose any AI tools they use to revise their manuscripts, and journals and conferences could begin mandating disclosure and/or turn to using detection services, as many teachers have done with student writing in class settings. Given these looming possibilities, we investigate whether academics view it as necessary to report AI use in manuscript preparation and how detectors react to the use of AI in academic writing.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computers & Society

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Green AI

Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, ... (+2 more)

cs.CY πŸ› arXiv πŸ“š 1.5K cites 7 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted