MuFuzz: Sequence-Aware Mutation and Seed Mask Guidance for Blockchain Smart Contract Fuzzing

December 07, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Peng Qian, Hanjie Wu, Zeren Du, Turan Vural, Dazhong Rong, Zheng Cao, Lun Zhang, Yanbin Wang, Jianhai Chen, Qinming He arXiv ID 2312.04512 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Citations 14 Venue IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
As blockchain smart contracts become more widespread and carry more valuable digital assets, they become an increasingly attractive target for attackers. Over the past few years, smart contracts have been subject to a plethora of devastating attacks, resulting in billions of dollars in financial losses. There has been a notable surge of research interest in identifying defects in smart contracts. However, existing smart contract fuzzing tools are still unsatisfactory. They struggle to screen out meaningful transaction sequences and specify critical inputs for each transaction. As a result, they can only trigger a limited range of contract states, making it difficult to unveil complicated vulnerabilities hidden in the deep state space. In this paper, we shed light on smart contract fuzzing by employing a sequence-aware mutation and seed mask guidance strategy. In particular, we first utilize data-flow-based feedback to determine transaction orders in a meaningful way and further introduce a sequence-aware mutation technique to explore deeper states. Thereafter, we design a mask-guided seed mutation strategy that biases the generated transaction inputs to hit target branches. In addition, we develop a dynamic-adaptive energy adjustment paradigm that balances the fuzzing resource allocation during a fuzzing campaign. We implement our designs into a new smart contract fuzzer named MuFuzz, and extensively evaluate it on three benchmarks. Empirical results demonstrate that MuFuzz outperforms existing tools in terms of both branch coverage and bug finding. Overall, MuFuzz achieves higher branch coverage than state-of-the-art fuzzers (up to 25%) and detects 30% more bugs than existing bug detectors.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted