GPU-Accelerated Batch-Dynamic Subgraph Matching

January 30, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Linshan Qiu, Lu Chen, Hailiang Jie, Xiangyu Ke, Yunjun Gao, Yang Liu, Zetao Zhang arXiv ID 2401.17018 Category cs.DC: Distributed Computing Citations 2 Venue IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Subgraph matching has garnered increasing attention for its diverse real-world applications. Given the dynamic nature of real-world graphs, addressing evolving scenarios without incurring prohibitive overheads has been a focus of research. However, existing approaches for dynamic subgraph matching often proceed serially, retrieving incremental matches for each updated edge individually. This approach falls short when handling batch data updates, leading to a decrease in system throughput. Leveraging the parallel processing power of GPUs, which can execute a massive number of cores simultaneously, has been widely recognized for performance acceleration in various domains. Surprisingly, systematic exploration of subgraph matching in the context of batch-dynamic graphs, particularly on a GPU platform, remains untouched. In this paper, we bridge this gap by introducing an efficient framework, GAMMA (GPU-Accelerated Batch-Dynamic Subgraph Matching). Our approach features a DFS-based warp-centric batch-dynamic subgraph matching algorithm. To ensure load balance in the DFS-based search, we propose warp-level work stealing via shared memory. Additionally, we introduce coalesced search to reduce redundant computations. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the superior performance of GAMMA. Compared to state-of-the-art algorithms, GAMMA showcases a performance improvement up to hundreds of times.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Distributed Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted