Stage: Query Execution Time Prediction in Amazon Redshift
March 04, 2024 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ SIGMOD Conference Companion
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Ziniu Wu, Ryan Marcus, Zhengchun Liu, Parimarjan Negi, Vikram Nathan, Pascal Pfeil, Gaurav Saxena, Mohammad Rahman, Balakrishnan Narayanaswamy, Tim Kraska
arXiv ID
2403.02286
Category
cs.DB: Databases
Citations
17
Venue
SIGMOD Conference Companion
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Query performance (e.g., execution time) prediction is a critical component of modern DBMSes. As a pioneering cloud data warehouse, Amazon Redshift relies on an accurate execution time prediction for many downstream tasks, ranging from high-level optimizations, such as automatically creating materialized views, to low-level tasks on the critical path of query execution, such as admission, scheduling, and execution resource control. Unfortunately, many existing execution time prediction techniques, including those used in Redshift, suffer from cold start issues, inaccurate estimation, and are not robust against workload/data changes. In this paper, we propose a novel hierarchical execution time predictor: the Stage predictor. The Stage predictor is designed to leverage the unique characteristics and challenges faced by Redshift. The Stage predictor consists of three model states: an execution time cache, a lightweight local model optimized for a specific DB instance with uncertainty measurement, and a complex global model that is transferable across all instances in Redshift. We design a systematic approach to use these models that best leverages optimality (cache), instance-optimization (local model), and transferable knowledge about Redshift (global model). Experimentally, we show that the Stage predictor makes more accurate and robust predictions while maintaining a practical inference latency and memory overhead. Overall, the Stage predictor can improve the average query execution latency by $20\%$ on these instances compared to the prior query performance predictor in Redshift.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Databases
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
The Case for Learned Index Structures
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Untangling Blockchain: A Data Processing View of Blockchain Systems
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Converting Static Image Datasets to Spiking Neuromorphic Datasets Using Saccades
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
BLOCKBENCH: A Framework for Analyzing Private Blockchains
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Data Synthesis based on Generative Adversarial Networks
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted