Opinion Dynamics for Utility Maximizing Agents: Exploring the Impact of the Resource Penalty

April 07, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Prashil Wankhede, Nirabhra Mandal, Sonia MartΓ­nez, Pavankumar Tallapragada arXiv ID 2404.04912 Category eess.SY: Systems & Control (EE) Cross-listed cs.GT, cs.MA, cs.SI Citations 2 Venue IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
We propose a continuous-time nonlinear model of opinion dynamics with utility-maximizing agents connected via a social influence network. A distinguishing feature of the proposed model is the inclusion of an opinion-dependent resource-penalty term in the utilities, which limits the agents from holding opinions of large magnitude. This model is applicable in scenarios where the opinions pertain to the usage of resources, such as money, time, computational resources etc. Each agent myopically seeks to maximize its utility by revising its opinion in the gradient ascent direction of its utility function, thus leading to the proposed opinion dynamics. We show that, for any arbitrary social influence network, opinions are ultimately bounded. For networks with weak antagonistic relations, we show that there exists a globally exponentially stable equilibrium using contraction theory. We establish conditions for the existence of consensus equilibrium and analyze the relative dominance of the agents at consensus. We also conduct a game-theoretic analysis of the underlying opinion formation game, including on Nash equilibria and on prices of anarchy in terms of satisfaction ratios. Additionally, we also investigate the oscillatory behavior of opinions in a two-agent scenario. Finally, simulations illustrate our findings.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Systems & Control (EE)

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted