Spanners in Planar Domains via Steiner Spanners and non-Steiner Tree Covers
April 07, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Sujoy Bhore, BalΓ‘zs Keszegh, Andrey Kupavskii, Hung Le, Alexandre Louvet, DΓΆmΓΆtΓΆr PΓ‘lvΓΆlgyi, Csaba D. TΓ³th
arXiv ID
2404.05045
Category
cs.CG: Computational Geometry
Cross-listed
cs.DS
Citations
5
Venue
ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
We study spanners in planar domains, including polygonal domains, polyhedral terrain, and planar metrics. Previous work showed that for any constant $Ξ΅\in (0,1)$, one could construct a $(2+Ξ΅)$-spanner with $O(n\log(n))$ edges (SICOMP 2019), and there is a lower bound of $Ξ©(n^2)$ edges for any $(2-Ξ΅)$-spanner (SoCG 2015). The main open question is whether a linear number of edges suffices and the stretch can be reduced to $2$. We resolve this problem by showing that for stretch $2$, one needs $Ξ©(n\log n)$ edges, and for stretch $2+Ξ΅$ for any fixed $Ξ΅\in (0,1)$, $O(n)$ edges are sufficient. Our lower bound is the first super-linear lower bound for stretch $2$. En route to achieve our result, we introduce the problem of constructing non-Steiner tree covers for metrics, which is a natural variant of the well-known Steiner point removal problem for trees (SODA 2001). Given a tree and a set of terminals in the tree, our goal is to construct a collection of a small number of dominating trees such that for every two points, at least one tree in the collection preserves their distance within a small stretch factor. Here, we identify an unexpected threshold phenomenon around $2$ where a sharp transition from $n$ trees to $Ξ(\log n)$ trees and then to $O(1)$ trees happens. Specifically, (i) for stretch $ 2-Ξ΅$, one needs $Ξ©(n)$ trees; (ii) for stretch $2$, $Ξ(\log n)$ tree is necessary and sufficient; and (iii) for stretch $2+Ξ΅$, a constant number of trees suffice. Furthermore, our lower bound technique for the non-Steiner tree covers of stretch $2$ has further applications in proving lower bounds for two related constructions in tree metrics: reliable spanners and locality-sensitive orderings. Our lower bound for locality-sensitive orderings matches the best upper bound (STOC 2022).
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Computational Geometry
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Dynamic Planar Convex Hull
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
TEMPO: Feature-Endowed TeichmΓΌller Extremal Mappings of Point Clouds
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Manufacturing Cost Estimation and Machining Feature Visualization
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Coresets for Clustering in Euclidean Spaces: Importance Sampling is Nearly Optimal
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Momen(e)t: Flavor the Moments in Learning to Classify Shapes
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted