Fully Dynamic Matching and Ordered Ruzsa-SzemerΓ©di Graphs
April 09, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Soheil Behnezhad, Alma Ghafari
arXiv ID
2404.06069
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
8
Venue
IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
We study the fully dynamic maximum matching problem. In this problem, the goal is to efficiently maintain an approximate maximum matching of a graph that is subject to edge insertions and deletions. Our focus is on algorithms that maintain the edges of a $(1-Ξ΅)$-approximate maximum matching for an arbitrarily small constant $Ξ΅> 0$. Until recently, the fastest known algorithm for this problem required $Ξ(n)$ time per update where $n$ is the number of vertices. This bound was slightly improved to $n/(\log^* n)^{Ξ©(1)}$ by Assadi, Behnezhad, Khanna, and Li [STOC'23] and very recently to $n/2^{Ξ©(\sqrt{\log n})}$ by Liu [FOCS'24]. Whether this can be improved to $n^{1-Ξ©(1)}$ remains a major open problem. In this paper, we introduce {\em Ordered Ruzsa-SzemerΓ©di (ORS)} graphs (a generalization of Ruzsa-SzemerΓ©di graphs) and show that the complexity of dynamic matching is closely tied to them. For $Ξ΄> 0$, define $ORS(Ξ΄n)$ to be the maximum number of matchings $M_1, \ldots, M_t$, each of size $Ξ΄n$, that one can pack in an $n$-vertex graph such that each matching $M_i$ is an {\em induced matching} in subgraph $M_1 \cup \ldots \cup M_{i}$. We show that there is a randomized algorithm that maintains a $(1-Ξ΅)$-approximate maximum matching of a fully dynamic graph in $$ \widetilde{O}\left( \sqrt{n^{1+Ξ΅} \cdot ORS(Ξ_Ξ΅(n))} \right) $$ amortized update-time. While the value of $ORS(Ξ(n))$ remains unknown and is only upper bounded by $n^{1-o(1)}$, the densest construction known from more than two decades ago only achieves $ORS(Ξ(n)) \geq n^{1/Ξ(\log \log n)} = n^{o(1)}$ [Fischer et al. STOC'02]. If this is close to the right bound, then our algorithm achieves an update-time of $\sqrt{n^{1+O(Ξ΅)}}$, resolving the aforementioned longstanding open problem in dynamic algorithms in a strong sense.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted