Probabilistic estimates of the diameters of the Rubik's Cube groups

April 10, 2024 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors So Hirata arXiv ID 2404.07337 Category cs.DM: Discrete Mathematics Cross-listed cs.DS, math.CO, math.PR Citations 4 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
The diameter of the Cayley graph of the Rubik's Cube group is the fewest number of turns needed to solve the Cube from the hardest initial configuration. For the 2$\times$2$\times$2 Cube, the diameter is 11 in the half-turn metric, 14 in the quarter-turn metric, 19 in the semi-quarter-turn metric, and 10 in the bi-quarter-turn metric. For the 3$\times$3$\times$3 Cube, the diameter was determined by Rokicki et al. to be 20 in the half-turn metric and 26 in the quarter-turn metric. This study shows that a modified version of the coupon collector's problem in probability theory can predict the diameters correctly for both 2$\times$2$\times$2 and 3$\times$3$\times$3 Cubes insofar as the quarter-turn metric is adopted. In the half-turn metric, the diameters are overestimated by one and two, respectively, for the 2$\times$2$\times$2 and 3$\times$3$\times$3 Cubes, whereas for the 2$\times$2$\times$2 Cube in the semi-quarter-turn and bi-quarter-turn metrics, they are overestimated by two and underestimated by one, respectively. Invoking the same probabilistic logic, the diameters of the 4$\times$4$\times$4 and 5$\times$5$\times$5 Cubes are predicted to be 48 (41) and 68 (58) in the quarter-turn (half-turn) metric, whose precise determinations are far beyond reach of classical supercomputing. The probabilistically estimated diameter is shown to obey the approximate formula of $\ln N / \ln r + \ln N / r$, where $N$ is the number of configurations and $r$ is the branching ratio.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Discrete Mathematics