Resistance Against Manipulative AI: key factors and possible actions

April 22, 2024 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› European Conference on Artificial Intelligence

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Piotr Wilczyล„ski, Wiktoria Mieleszczenko-Kowszewicz, Przemysล‚aw Biecek arXiv ID 2404.14230 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 7 Venue European Conference on Artificial Intelligence Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
If AI is the new electricity, what should we do to keep ourselves from getting electrocuted? In this work, we explore factors related to the potential of large language models (LLMs) to manipulate human decisions. We describe the results of two experiments designed to determine what characteristics of humans are associated with their susceptibility to LLM manipulation, and what characteristics of LLMs are associated with their manipulativeness potential. We explore human factors by conducting user studies in which participants answer general knowledge questions using LLM-generated hints, whereas LLM factors by provoking language models to create manipulative statements. Then, we analyze their obedience, the persuasion strategies used, and the choice of vocabulary. Based on these experiments, we discuss two actions that can protect us from LLM manipulation. In the long term, we put AI literacy at the forefront, arguing that educating society would minimize the risk of manipulation and its consequences. We also propose an ad hoc solution, a classifier that detects manipulation of LLMs - a Manipulation Fuse.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted