Ecology, Spatial Structure, and Selection Pressure Induce Strong Signatures in Phylogenetic Structure
May 12, 2024 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ Artificial Life
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Matthew Andres Moreno, Santiago Rodriguez-Papa, Emily Dolson
arXiv ID
2405.07245
Category
q-bio.PE
Cross-listed
cs.NE
Citations
2
Venue
Artificial Life
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
Evolutionary dynamics are shaped by a variety of fundamental, generic drivers, including spatial structure, ecology, and selection pressure. These drivers impact the trajectory of evolution, and have been hypothesized to influence phylogenetic structure. Here, we set out to assess (1) if spatial structure, ecology, and selection pressure leave detectable signatures in phylogenetic structure, (2) the extent, in particular, to which ecology can be detected and discerned in the presence of spatial structure, and (3) the extent to which these phylogenetic signatures generalize across evolutionary systems. To this end, we analyze phylogenies generated by manipulating spatial structure, ecology, and selection pressure within three computational models of varied scope and sophistication. We find that selection pressure, spatial structure, and ecology have characteristic effects on phylogenetic metrics, although these effects are complex and not always intuitive. Signatures have some consistency across systems when using equivalent taxonomic unit definitions (e.g., individual, genotype, species). Further, we find that sufficiently strong ecology can be detected in the presence of spatial structure. We also find that, while low-resolution phylogenetic reconstructions can bias some phylogenetic metrics, high-resolution reconstructions recapitulate them faithfully. Although our results suggest potential for evolutionary inference of spatial structure, ecology, and selection pressure through phylogenetic analysis, further methods development is needed to distinguish these drivers' phylometric signatures from each other and to appropriately normalize phylogenetic metrics. With such work, phylogenetic analysis could provide a versatile toolkit to study large-scale evolving populations.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ q-bio.PE
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Simulating COVID-19 in a University Environment
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
How morphological development can guide evolution
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Evolutionary forces in language change
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Entropy and Diversity: The Axiomatic Approach
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
The evolution of conditional moral assessment in indirect reciprocity
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted