Multiplicative Weights Update, Area Convexity and Random Coordinate Descent for Densest Subgraph Problems

May 29, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Machine Learning

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ta Duy Nguyen, Alina Ene arXiv ID 2405.18809 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 10 Venue International Conference on Machine Learning Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We study the densest subgraph problem and give algorithms via multiplicative weights update and area convexity that converge in $O\left(\frac{\log m}{Ξ΅^{2}}\right)$ and $O\left(\frac{\log m}Ξ΅\right)$ iterations, respectively, both with nearly-linear time per iteration. Compared with the work by Bahmani et al. (2014), our MWU algorithm uses a very different and much simpler procedure for recovering the dense subgraph from the fractional solution and does not employ a binary search. Compared with the work by Boob et al. (2019), our algorithm via area convexity improves the iteration complexity by a factor $Ξ”$ -- the maximum degree in the graph, and matches the fastest theoretical runtime currently known via flows (Chekuri et al., 2022) in total time. Next, we study the dense subgraph decomposition problem and give the first practical iterative algorithm with linear convergence rate $O\left(mn\log\frac{1}Ξ΅\right)$ via accelerated random coordinate descent. This significantly improves over $O\left(\frac{m\sqrt{mnΞ”}}Ξ΅\right)$ time of the FISTA-based algorithm by Harb et al. (2022). In the high precision regime $Ξ΅\ll\frac{1}{n}$ where we can even recover the exact solution, our algorithm has a total runtime of $O\left(mn\log n\right)$, matching the exact algorithm via parametric flows (Gallo et al., 1989). Empirically, we show that this algorithm is very practical and scales to very large graphs, and its performance is competitive with widely used methods that have significantly weaker theoretical guarantees.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted