A Comparison of Vulnerability Feature Extraction Methods from Textual Attack Patterns

July 09, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Refat Othman, Bruno Rossi, Russo Barbara arXiv ID 2407.06753 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.SE Citations 3 Venue EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Nowadays, threat reports from cybersecurity vendors incorporate detailed descriptions of attacks within unstructured text. Knowing vulnerabilities that are related to these reports helps cybersecurity researchers and practitioners understand and adjust to evolving attacks and develop mitigation plans. This paper aims to aid cybersecurity researchers and practitioners in choosing attack extraction methods to enhance the monitoring and sharing of threat intelligence. In this work, we examine five feature extraction methods (TF-IDF, LSI, BERT, MiniLM, RoBERTa) and find that Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) outperforms the other four methods with a precision of 75\% and an F1 score of 64\%. The findings offer valuable insights to the cybersecurity community, and our research can aid cybersecurity researchers in evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of upcoming extraction methods.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted