Explicit Folded Reed-Solomon and Multiplicity Codes Achieve Relaxed Generalized Singleton Bounds
August 28, 2024 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ Symposium on the Theory of Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yeyuan Chen, Zihan Zhang
arXiv ID
2408.15925
Category
cs.IT: Information Theory
Cross-listed
math.CO
Citations
27
Venue
Symposium on the Theory of Computing
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
In this paper, we prove that explicit FRS codes and multiplicity codes achieve relaxed generalized Singleton bounds for list size $L\ge1.$ Specifically, we show the following: (1) FRS code of length $n$ and rate $R$ over the alphabet $\mathbb{F}_q^s$ with distinct evaluation points is $\left(\frac{L}{L+1}\left(1-\frac{sR}{s-L+1}\right),L\right)$ list-decodable (LD) for list size $L\in[s]$. (2) Multiplicity code of length $n$ and rate $R$ over the alphabet $\mathbb{F}_p^s$ with distinct evaluation points is $\left(\frac{L}{L+1}\left(1-\frac{sR}{s-L+1}\right),L\right)$ LD for list size $L\in[s]$. Choosing $s=ฮ(1/ฮต^2)$ and $L=O(1/ฮต)$, our results imply that both FRS codes and multiplicity codes achieve LD capacity $1-R-ฮต$ with optimal list size $O(1/ฮต)$. This exponentially improves the previous state of the art $(1/ฮต)^{O(1/ฮต)}$ established by Kopparty et. al. (FOCS 2018) and Tamo (IEEE TIT, 2024). In particular, our results on FRS codes fully resolve a open problem proposed by Guruswami and Rudra (STOC 2006). Furthermore, our results imply the first explicit constructions of $(1-R-ฮต,O(1/ฮต))$ LD codes of rate $R$ with poly-sized alphabets. Our method can also be extended to analyze the list-recoverability (LR) of FRS codes. We provide a tighter radius upper bound that FRS codes cannot be $(\frac{L+1-\ell}{L+1}(1-\frac{mR}{m-1})+o(1),\ell, L)$ LR where $m=\lceil\log_{\ell}{(L+1)}\rceil$. We conjecture this bound is almost tight when $L+1=\ell^a$ for any $a\in\mathbb{N}^{\ge 2}$. To give some evidences, we show FRS codes are $\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{sR}{s-2},2,3\right)$ LR, which proves the tightness in the smallest non-trivial case. Our bound refutes the possibility that FRS codes could achieve LR capacity $(1-R-ฮต, \ell, O(\frac{\ell}ฮต))$. This implies an intrinsic separation between LD and LR of FRS codes.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Information Theory
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Problems
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Towards Smart and Reconfigurable Environment: Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Wireless Network
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Wireless Communications with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Opportunities and Challenges
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Energy Efficiency in Wireless Communication
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
An Overview of Signal Processing Techniques for Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted