Know Your Account: Double Graph Inference-based Account De-anonymization on Ethereum

November 28, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Shuyi Miao, Wangjie Qiu, Hongwei Zheng, Qinnan Zhang, Xiaofan Tu, Xunan Liu, Yang Liu, Jin Dong, Zhiming Zheng arXiv ID 2411.18875 Category cs.SI: Social & Info Networks Citations 2 Venue IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The scaled Web 3.0 digital economy, represented by decentralized finance (DeFi), has sparked increasing interest in the past few years, which usually relies on blockchain for token transfer and diverse transaction logic. However, illegal behaviors, such as financial fraud, hacker attacks, and money laundering, are rampant in the blockchain ecosystem and seriously threaten its integrity and security. In this paper, we propose a novel double graph-based Ethereum account de-anonymization inference method, dubbed DBG4ETH, which aims to capture the behavioral patterns of accounts comprehensively and has more robust analytical and judgment capabilities for current complex and continuously generated transaction behaviors. Specifically, we first construct a global static graph to build complex interactions between the various account nodes for all transaction data. Then, we also construct a local dynamic graph to learn about the gradual evolution of transactions over different periods. Different graphs focus on information from different perspectives, and features of global and local, static and dynamic transaction graphs are available through DBG4ETH. In addition, we propose an adaptive confidence calibration method to predict the results by feeding the calibrated weighted prediction values into the classifier. Experimental results show that DBG4ETH achieves state-of-the-art results in the account identification task, improving the F1-score by at least 3.75% and up to 40.52% compared to processing each graph type individually and outperforming similar account identity inference methods by 5.23% to 12.91%.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Social & Info Networks

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted