Eliminating Majority Illusions

February 20, 2025 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Foivos Fioravantes, Abhiruk Lahiri, Antonio Lauerbach, Lluรญs Sabater, Marie Diana Sieper, Samuel Wolf arXiv ID 2502.14353 Category cs.CC: Computational Complexity Cross-listed cs.SI Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
An opinion illusion refers to a phenomenon in social networks where agents may witness distributions of opinions among their neighbours that do not accurately reflect the true distribution of opinions in the population as a whole. A specific case of this occurs when there are only two possible choices, such as whether to receive the COVID-19 vaccine or vote on EU membership, which is commonly referred to as a majority illusion. In this work, we study the topological properties of social networks that lead to opinion illusions and focus on minimizing the number of agents that need to be influenced to eliminate these illusions. To do so, we propose an initial, but systematic study of the algorithmic behaviour of this problem. We show that the problem is NP-hard even for underlying topologies that are rather restrictive, being planar and of bounded diameter. We then look for exact algorithms that scale well as the input grows (FPT). We argue the in-existence of such algorithms even when the number of vertices that must be influenced is bounded, or when the social network is arranged in a ``path-like'' fashion (has bounded pathwidth). On the positive side, we present an FPT algorithm for networks with ``star-like'' structure (bounded vertex cover number). Finally, we construct an FPT algorithm for ``tree-like'' networks (bounded treewidth) when the number of vertices that must be influenced is bounded. This algorithm is then used to provide a PTAS for planar graphs.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computational Complexity