Pauli measurements are not optimal for single-copy tomography

February 25, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Symposium on the Theory of Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jayadev Acharya, Abhilash Dharmavarapu, Yuhan Liu, Nengkun Yu arXiv ID 2502.18170 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.CC, cs.IT Citations 10 Venue Symposium on the Theory of Computing Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Quantum state tomography is a fundamental problem in quantum computing. Given $n$ copies of an unknown $N$-qubit state $ρ\in \mathbb{C}^{d \times d},d=2^N$, the goal is to learn the state up to an accuracy $Ρ$ in trace distance, with at least probability 0.99. We are interested in the copy complexity, the minimum number of copies of $ρ$ needed to fulfill the task. Pauli measurements have attracted significant attention due to their ease of implementation in limited settings. The best-known upper bound is $O(\frac{N \cdot 12^N}{Ρ^2})$, and no non-trivial lower bound is known besides the general single-copy lower bound $Ω(\frac{8^n}{Ρ^2})$, achieved by hard-to-implement structured POVMs such as MUB, SIC-POVM, and uniform POVM. We have made significant progress on this long-standing problem. We first prove a stronger upper bound of $O(\frac{10^N}{Ρ^2})$. To complement it with a lower bound of $Ω(\frac{9.118^N}{Ρ^2})$, which holds under adaptivity. To our knowledge, this demonstrates the first known separation between Pauli measurements and structured POVMs. The new lower bound is a consequence of a novel framework for adaptive quantum state tomography with measurement constraints. The main advantage over prior methods is that we can use measurement-dependent hard instances to prove tight lower bounds for Pauli measurements. Moreover, we connect the copy-complexity lower bound to the eigenvalues of the measurement information channel, which governs the measurement's capacity to distinguish states. To demonstrate the generality of the new framework, we obtain tight-bounds for adaptive quantum tomography with $k$-outcome measurements, where we recover existing results and establish new ones.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted