Detecting Arbitrary Planted Subgraphs in Random Graphs

March 24, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Dor Elimelech, Wasim Huleihel arXiv ID 2503.19069 Category math.ST Cross-listed cs.IT, cs.LG, math.CO, math.PR Citations 4 Venue Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
The problems of detecting and recovering planted structures/subgraphs in ErdΕ‘s-RΓ©nyi random graphs, have received significant attention over the past three decades, leading to many exciting results and mathematical techniques. However, prior work has largely focused on specific ad hoc planted structures and inferential settings, while a general theory has remained elusive. In this paper, we bridge this gap by investigating the detection of an \emph{arbitrary} planted subgraph $Ξ“= Ξ“_n$ in an ErdΕ‘s-RΓ©nyi random graph $\mathcal{G}(n, q_n)$, where the edge probability within $Ξ“$ is $p_n$. We examine both the statistical and computational aspects of this problem and establish the following results. In the dense regime, where the edge probabilities $p_n$ and $q_n$ are fixed, we tightly characterize the information-theoretic and computational thresholds for detecting $Ξ“$, and provide conditions under which a computational-statistical gap arises. Most notably, these thresholds depend on $Ξ“$ only through its number of edges, maximum degree, and maximum subgraph density. Our lower and upper bounds are general and apply to any value of $p_n$ and $q_n$ as functions of $n$. Accordingly, we also analyze the sparse regime where $q_n = Θ(n^{-Ξ±})$ and $p_n-q_n =Θ(q_n)$, with $Ξ±\in[0,2]$, as well as the critical regime where $p_n=1-o(1)$ and $q_n = Θ(n^{-Ξ±})$, both of which have been widely studied, for specific choices of $Ξ“$. For these regimes, we show that our bounds are tight for all planted subgraphs investigated in the literature thus far\textemdash{}and many more. Finally, we identify conditions under which detection undergoes sharp phase transition, where the boundaries at which algorithms succeed or fail shift abruptly as a function of $q_n$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” math.ST

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted