Detecting Arbitrary Planted Subgraphs in Random Graphs
March 24, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Dor Elimelech, Wasim Huleihel
arXiv ID
2503.19069
Category
math.ST
Cross-listed
cs.IT,
cs.LG,
math.CO,
math.PR
Citations
4
Venue
Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
The problems of detecting and recovering planted structures/subgraphs in ErdΕs-RΓ©nyi random graphs, have received significant attention over the past three decades, leading to many exciting results and mathematical techniques. However, prior work has largely focused on specific ad hoc planted structures and inferential settings, while a general theory has remained elusive. In this paper, we bridge this gap by investigating the detection of an \emph{arbitrary} planted subgraph $Ξ= Ξ_n$ in an ErdΕs-RΓ©nyi random graph $\mathcal{G}(n, q_n)$, where the edge probability within $Ξ$ is $p_n$. We examine both the statistical and computational aspects of this problem and establish the following results. In the dense regime, where the edge probabilities $p_n$ and $q_n$ are fixed, we tightly characterize the information-theoretic and computational thresholds for detecting $Ξ$, and provide conditions under which a computational-statistical gap arises. Most notably, these thresholds depend on $Ξ$ only through its number of edges, maximum degree, and maximum subgraph density. Our lower and upper bounds are general and apply to any value of $p_n$ and $q_n$ as functions of $n$. Accordingly, we also analyze the sparse regime where $q_n = Ξ(n^{-Ξ±})$ and $p_n-q_n =Ξ(q_n)$, with $Ξ±\in[0,2]$, as well as the critical regime where $p_n=1-o(1)$ and $q_n = Ξ(n^{-Ξ±})$, both of which have been widely studied, for specific choices of $Ξ$. For these regimes, we show that our bounds are tight for all planted subgraphs investigated in the literature thus far\textemdash{}and many more. Finally, we identify conditions under which detection undergoes sharp phase transition, where the boundaries at which algorithms succeed or fail shift abruptly as a function of $q_n$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β math.ST
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
An introduction to Topological Data Analysis: fundamental and practical aspects for data scientists
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Minimax Optimal Procedures for Locally Private Estimation
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidence
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Fast low-rank estimation by projected gradient descent: General statistical and algorithmic guarantees
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
User-friendly guarantees for the Langevin Monte Carlo with inaccurate gradient
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted