Online Timestamp-based Transactional Isolation Checking of Database Systems (Extended Version)

April 02, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Hexu Li, Hengfeng Wei, Hongrong Ouyang, Yuxing Chen, Na Yang, Ruohao Zhang, Anqun Pan arXiv ID 2504.01477 Category cs.DB: Databases Citations 1 Venue IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Serializability (SER) and snapshot isolation (SI) are widely used transactional isolation levels in database systems. The isolation checking problem asks whether a given execution history of a database system satisfies a specified isolation level. However, existing SER and SI checkers, whether traditional black-box checkers or recent timestamp-based white-box ones, operate offline and require the entire history to be available to construct a dependency graph, making them unsuitable for continuous and ever-growing histories. This paper addresses online isolation checking by extending the timestamp-based isolation checking approach to online settings. Specifically, we design CHRONOS, an efficient timestamp-based offline SI checker. CHRONOS is incremental and avoids constructing a start-ordered serialization graph for the entire history, making it well-suited for online scenarios. We further extend CHRONOS into an online SI checker, AION, addressing several key challenges unique to online settings. Additionally, we develop AION-SER for online SER checking. Experiments highlight that CHRONOS processes offline histories with up to one million transactions in seconds, greatly outperforming existing SI checkers. Furthermore, AION and AION-SER sustain a throughput of approximately 12K transactions per second, demonstrating their practicality for online isolation checking.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Databases

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted