PUSHtap: PIM-based In-Memory HTAP with Unified Data Storage Format
August 04, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yilong Zhao, Mingyu Gao, Huanchen Zhang, Fangxin Liu, Gongye Chen, He Xian, Haibing Guan, Li Jiang
arXiv ID
2508.02309
Category
cs.DC: Distributed Computing
Citations
2
Venue
International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Hybrid transaction/analytical processing (HTAP) is an emerging database paradigm that supports both online transaction processing (OLTP) and online analytical processing (OLAP) workloads. Computing-intensive OLTP operations, involving row-wise data manipulation, are suitable for row-store format. In contrast, memory-intensive OLAP operations, which are column-centric, benefit from column-store format. This \emph{data-format dilemma} prevents HTAP systems from concurrently achieving three design goals: performance isolation, data freshness, and workload-specific optimization. Another background technology is Processing-in-Memory (PIM), which integrates computing units (PIM units) inside DRAM memory devices to accelerate memory-intensive workloads, including OLAP. Our key insight is to combine the interleaved CPU access and localized PIM unit access to provide two-dimensional access to address the data format contradictions inherent in HTAP. First, we propose a unified data storage format with novel data alignment and placement techniques to optimize the effective bandwidth of CPUs and PIM units and exploit the PIM's parallelism. Second, we implement the multi-version concurrency control (MVCC) essential for single-instance HTAP. Third, we extend the commercial PIM architecture to support the OLAP operations and concurrent access from PIM and CPU. Experiments show that PUSHtap can achieve 3.4\texttimes{}/4.4\texttimes{} OLAP/OLTP throughput improvement compared to multi-instance PIM-based design.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Distributed Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hyperledger Fabric: A Distributed Operating System for Permissioned Blockchains
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Reproducing GW150914: the first observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
MXNet: A Flexible and Efficient Machine Learning Library for Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Efficient Architecture-Aware Acceleration of BWA-MEM for Multicore Systems
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted