Efficient Fuzzy Private Set Intersection from Secret-shared OPRF

April 16, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท ๐Ÿ› the 2026 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Xinpeng Yang, Meng Hao, Chenkai Weng, Robert H. Deng, Yonggang Wen, Tianwei Zhang arXiv ID 2604.14909 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Citations 0 Venue the 2026 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
Abstract
Private set intersection (PSI) enables a sender holding a set $Q$ of size $m$ and a receiver holding a set $W$ of size $n$ to securely compute the intersection $Q \cap W$. Fuzzy PSI (FPSI) is a PSI variant where the receiver learns the items $q \in Q$ for which there exists some $w \in W$ satisfying $\mathsf{dist}(q, w) \le ฮด$ under a given distance metric. Although several FPSI works are proposed for $L_{p}$ distance metrics with $p \in [1, \infty]$, they either heavily rely on expensive homomorphic encryptions, or incur undesirable complexity, e.g., exponential to the element dimension, both of which lead to poor practical efficiency. In this work, we propose efficient FPSI protocols for $L_{p \in [1, \infty]}$ distance metrics, primarily leveraging significantly cheaper symmetric-key operations. Our protocols achieve linear communication and computation complexity in the set sizes $m,n$, the dimension $d$, and the distance threshold $ฮด$. Our core building block is an oblivious programmable PRF with secret-shared outputs, which may be of independent interest. Furthermore, we incorporate a prefix technique that reduces the dependence on the distance threshold $ฮด$ to logarithmic, which is particularly suitable for large $ฮด$. We implement our FPSI protocols and compare them with state-of-the-art constructions. Experimental results demonstrate that our protocols consistently and significantly outperform existing works across all settings. Specifically, our protocols achieve a speedup of $12{\sim}145\times$ in running time and a reduction of $3{\sim}8\times$ in communication cost compared to Gao et al.~(ASIACRYPT'24) and a speedup of $9{\sim}80\times$ in running time and a reduction of $5{\sim}19\times$ in communication cost compared to Dang et al.~(CCS'25).
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Cryptography & Security