Local Inconsistency Resolution: The Interplay between Attention and Control in Probabilistic Models

April 18, 2026 Β· Grace Period Β· πŸ› Proceedings of the The 29th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2026

⏳ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Oliver E. Richardson, Mandana Samiei, Mehran Shakerinava, Joseph D. Viviano, Abdessamad El Kabid, Ali Parviz, Yoshua Bengio arXiv ID 2604.17140 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 0 Venue Proceedings of the The 29th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2026
Abstract
We present a generic algorithm for learning and approximate inference with an intuitive epistemic interpretation: iteratively focus on a subset of the model and resolve inconsistencies using the parameters under control. This framework, which we call Local Inconsistency Resolution (LIR) is built upon Probabilistic Dependency Graphs (PDGs), which provide a flexible representational foundation capable of capturing inconsistent beliefs. We show how LIR unifies and generalizes a wide variety of important algorithms in the literature, including the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm, belief propagation, adversarial training, GANs, and GFlowNets. In the last case, LIR actually suggests a more natural loss, which we demonstrate improves GFlowNet convergence. Each method can be recovered as a specific instance of LIR by choosing a procedure to direct focus (attention and control). We implement this algorithm for discrete PDGs and study its properties on synthetically generated PDGs, comparing its behavior to the global optimization semantics of the full PDG.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence