On the Optimal Sample Complexity of Offline Multi-Armed Bandits with KL Regularization

May 04, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท + Add venue

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Kaixuan Ji, Qiwei Di, Heyang Zhao, Qingyue Zhao, Quanquan Gu arXiv ID 2605.02141 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.AI, math.ST, stat.ML Citations 0
Abstract
Kullback-Leibler (KL) regularization is widely used in offline decision-making and offers several benefits, motivating recent work on the sample complexity of offline learning with respect to KL-regularized performance metrics. Nevertheless, the exact sample complexity of KL-regularized offline learning remains largely from fully characterized. In this paper, we study this question in the setting of multi-armed bandits (MABs). We provide a sharp analysis of KL-PCB (Zhao et al., 2026), showing that it achieves a sample complexity of $\tilde{O}(ฮทSAC^{ฯ€^*}/ฮต)$ under large regularization $ฮท= \tilde{O}(ฮต^{-1})$, and a sample complexity of $\tildeฮฉ(SAC^{ฯ€^*}/ฮต^2)$ under small regularization $ฮท= \tildeฮฉ(ฮต^{-1})$, where $ฮท$ is the regularization parameter, $S$ is the number of contexts, $A$ is the number of arms, $C^{ฯ€^*}$ policy coverage coefficient at the optimal policy $ฯ€^*$, $ฮต$ is the desired sub-optimality, and $\tilde{O}$ and $\tildeฮฉ$ hide all poly-logarithmic factors. We further provide a pair of sharper sample complexity lower bounds, which matches the upper bounds over the entire range of regularization strengths. Overall, our results provide a nearly complete characterization of offline multi-armed bandits with KL regularization.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning