Reference-Sampled Boltzmann Projection for KL-Regularized RLVR: Target-Matched Weighted SFT, Finite One-Shot Gaps, and Policy Mirror Descent

May 04, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท + Add venue

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Yao Shu, Chenxing Wei, Hongbin Lin, Shuang Qiu, Hui Xiong arXiv ID 2605.02469 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 0
Abstract
Online reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) turns checkable outcomes into a scalable training signal, but it keeps rollout generation, verifier scoring, and reference-policy evaluations on the optimization path. Static weighted supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on precomputed rollouts seems to remove this bottleneck, yet a weighted likelihood is not specified by rewards alone: its sampler and weights induce the policy being fit. This paper identifies the reference-sampled weighted-SFT objective whose induced policy equals the fixed-reference KL-regularized RLVR optimizer. The optimizer is the standard Boltzmann target policy, obtained by exponentially tilting the reference policy by verifier reward. Matching a weighted-SFT induced policy to this target forces density-ratio weights; in the reference-sampled subclass, this reduces uniquely, up to prompt scaling, to the prompt-normalized Boltzmann weight $\exp(r(x,y)/ฮฒ)/Z(x)$. BOLT, a Boltzmann-Targeted SFT procedure, is the empirical estimator of this projection. The finite one-shot analysis separates the exact stored-support price $ฮฒ\log(1/ฯ€^*(S_N\mid x))$ from partition estimation, effective-sample-size variance, generalization, optimization, and approximation errors. This decomposition explains why extra SFT epochs cannot repair missing reference-policy coverage and exposes the temperature--coverage--variance frontier. When coverage needs adaptive sampling, refreshed Boltzmann projections become KL policy mirror descent; finite inner solves enter as additive drift from the exact mirror step. Single-run Qwen experiments provide projection evidence for the target-matched weight, one-shot saturation, refreshed-sampler gains, and optimization-time savings, within the stated single-run scope.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning