The 1-Bit Barrier is Universal: k-Stage Pipeline Composition and Unified Leakage Bounds for Standard Modular Reductions in PQC Hardware

May 04, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท + Add venue

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Ray Iskander, Khaled Kirah arXiv ID 2605.02856 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Citations 0
Abstract
This is Paper 7 of a series of formally-verified analyses of masked NTT hardware for post-quantum cryptography; Paper 1 [1] established structural dependency analysis of the QANARY platform, and Paper 2 [2] quantified security margins under partial NTT masking. Arbitrary-depth $k$-stage masked NTT pipelines with fresh inter-stage masking and per-stage PF-PINI($\leq 2$) gadgets satisfy a per-observation cardinality bound of $2 \cdot q^{2k-2}$ on the preimage of any output value, machine-checked in Lean 4 with zero \texttt{sorry}. Under the standard (informal) semantic translation that divides this cardinality by the total mask-tuple space size $q^{2k-1}$, the per-observation conditional probability bound is $2/q$, independent of pipeline depth $k$. The QANARY program has previously established machine-checked cardinality bounds on the per-observation leakage of masked NTT hardware: PF-PINI(2) for Barrett reduction (Paper 5 [3]), 2-stage composition with fresh inter-stage masking (Paper 6 [4]), an underlying universality theorem (Paper 3 [5]), and PF-PINI(1) for butterfly wires (Paper 4 [6]). This paper closes the program with four contributions. First, a $k$-stage composition theorem generalizing Paper 6's two-stage result to arbitrary $k \geq 1$ gives the last-stage-determined bound $G_{k-1}.\texttt{maxMult} \cdot q^{2k-2}$: only the last stage's PF-PINI parameter survives, with intermediate parameters erased by fresh inter-stage masking. Second, Montgomery reduction satisfies PF-PINI(2) with tight max-multiplicity 2. Third, we assemble these into the end-to-end bound $2 \cdot q^{2k-2}$ for any depth-$k$ PF-PINI($\leq 2$) pipeline under fresh inter-stage masking. Fourth, a Lean-verified hypothesis-violation conditional anchors the prior empirical and structural Adams Bridge analyses ([1, 2, 7, 8]).
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Cryptography & Security