๐
๐
The Cartographer
More efficient PBWT prefix-array access via batching
May 15, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท + Add venue
Abstract
The positional Burrows-Wheeler Transform (PBWT) is commonly used to store haplotype panels compactly in such a way that, given a query haplotype, we can quickly find the set maximal exact matches (SMEMs) between the query and the haplotypes in a panel. There are generally two steps in this process: first we find the maximal substrings of the query that occur in the same positions in haplotypes in the panel and then, for each such substring, report the haplotypes in the panel in which the substring occurs in the same position as in the query. Very recently, Bonizzoni, Gagie and Gao (2026) gave two time-space tradeoffs for the second step: they use either $O ((r + h) \log n)$ bits and $O (\log \log \min (h, \ell) + k)$ time to report $k$ haplotypes in the panel, or $O (r \log h + h \log n)$ bits and $O (k \log \log h)$ time, where $r$ is the number of runs in the panel's PBWT and $h$, $\ell$ and $n = h \ell$ are the panel's height, length and size, respectively. We observe here that if we can batch queries until we have found $r \lg (h) / \lg r$ such substrings and we report an average of at least $\lg (r) / \lg h$ haplotypes in the panel per substring, for example, then for the second step we can easily use $O (r \log h)$ bits and constant time to report each haplotype.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Data Structures & Algorithms
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
๐
๐
The Cartographer