Centralized vs Decentralized Federated Learning: A trade-off performance analysis

May 15, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท + Add venue

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Chaimaa Medjadji, Guilain Leduc, Sylvain Kubler, Yves Le Traon arXiv ID 2605.16089 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 0
Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for collaborative model training across distributed edge devices while preserving data privacy especially with the huge increase amount of data due to the adoption of technologies which contributes to the growing number of IoT devices. Storing this amount of data centrally is challenging due to issues like limited communication, privacy, and regulations. FL can be Centralized (CFL), Decentralized (DFL), and Semi-decentralized (SDFL). Choosing the right FL architecture depends on the application's needs. However, very few research studies have experimentally compared these three types of architectures to not only understand the respective strengths and limitations, but also trade-offs between different performance indicators. This paper overcome this lack of analysis, conducting experimental analyses using the Fedstellar simulator, MNIST dataset, and MLP classifier.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning