Evaluating Design Video Generation: Metrics for Compositional Fidelity

May 15, 2026 Β· Grace Period Β· + Add venue

⏳ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Adrienne Deganutti, Dingning Cao, Jaejung Seol, Elad Hirsch, Purvanshi Mehta arXiv ID 2605.16223 Category cs.GR: Graphics Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CV Citations 0
Abstract
Generative video models are increasingly used in design animation tasks, yet no standardized evaluation framework exists for this domain. Unlike natural video generation, design animation imposes structured constraints: specific components shall animate with prescribed motion types, directions, speed and timing, while non-animated regions must remain stable and layout structure must be preserved. This paper provides a fully automated evaluation framework organized across four dimensions: layout fidelity, motion correctness, temporal quality, and content fidelity. This eliminates the reliance on subjective human evaluation and establishes a common basis for benchmarking progress in the field.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Graphics

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Everybody Dance Now

Caroline Chan, Shiry Ginosar, ... (+2 more)

cs.GR πŸ› ICCV πŸ“š 820 cites 7 years ago
R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Animating Human Athletics

Jessica K. Hodgins, Wayne L. Wooten, ... (+2 more)

cs.GR πŸ› SIGGRAPH πŸ“š 765 cites 3 years ago