Bandwidth-Aware and Cost-Efficient Pipeline Parallel Scheduling in Geo-Distributed LLM Training

May 25, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท + Add venue

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Han Zhang, Jianchun Liu, Hongli Xu arXiv ID 2605.25375 Category cs.DC: Distributed Computing Citations 0
Abstract
The rapid evolution of large language models (LLMs) has made geographically distributed training necessary due to GPU scarcity within a single cloud region. In such cross-region settings, Pipeline Parallelism (PP) is communication-efficient, yet scheduling PP remains challenging under heterogeneous inter-region bandwidth and regional electricity prices. Existing schedulers are either delay-first, incurring high electricity cost, or cost-first, relying on rigid resource allocation that prolongs Job Completion Time (JCT). They are also ineffective at optimizing execution order in multi-tenant environments, where long-running and bandwidth-intensive jobs can cause head-of-line (HoL) blocking and degrade overall performance. To this end, we propose BACE-Pipe, a bandwidth-aware and cost-efficient pipeline scheduling framework for LLM training across geo-distributed clusters. BACE-Pipe first introduces a dynamic job prioritization mechanism that optimizes execution order by jointly considering job characteristics (e.g., computation time) and real-time network utilization. It then employs a bandwidth-aware pathfinder to identify feasible cross-region pipeline paths that satisfy communication constraints, thereby preventing communication from stalling the pipeline. Among all feasible paths, a cost-minimizing allocator determines the optimal GPU placement strategy by preferentially assigning resources to regions with lower electricity prices. Consequently, BACE-Pipe mitigates HoL blocking, improves resource utilization, and simultaneously reduces both JCT and total electricity cost. Extensive simulations show that BACE-Pipe reduces average JCT by 27.9%--64.7% and total electricity cost by 12.6%--30.6% compared with state-of-the-art baselines.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Distributed Computing