Rethinking Small VLM Quantization: From Component-Wise Analysis to Hardware-Aware Edge Deployment

July 09, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท ๐Ÿ› the ICML 2026 Workshop on Hypothesis Testing

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Hyeju Shin, Chorwon Kim, Ryangsoo Kim, Hark Yoo, Jaein Kim arXiv ID 2607.08029 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Citations 0 Venue the ICML 2026 Workshop on Hypothesis Testing
Abstract
The emergence of vision language models with fewer than 3 billion parameters has accelerated the implementation of on-device multimodal intelligence. However, a detailed understanding of component-wise quantization remains a bottleneck for optimal deployment. This paper presents a systematic evaluation framework for empirically validating five hypotheses across six quantization configurations on the Jetson Orin NX and AGX. By separating the vision encoder, projector, and large language model backbone yields the following results: (1) Quantization sensitivity is governed by the structural paradigm (MoE vs. dense) rather than scale alone, with MoE backbones mitigating INT4 noise where dense backbones degrade; (2) SigLIP encoders incur disproportionate INT8 latency on Jetson Ampere--a deployment-specific encoder-kernel-hardware interaction, not a SigLIP flaw; (3) Although INT4 quantization of LLMs greatly reduces VRAM consumption, it also causes slower token generation due to dequantization overhead; (4) Composite quantization errors are largely additive, except along the modality-alignment path, which is architecture-dependent; (5) The intelligence-per-joule profile varies significantly across platforms owing to memory bandwidth constraints.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning