MIFA: An MILP-based Framework for Improving Differential Fault Attacks

August 07, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท ๐Ÿ› IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, Vol. 2026, No. 3, pp. 465-488, 2026

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Hanbeom Shin, Insung Kim, Sunyeop Kim, Byoungjin Seok, Deukjo Hong, Jaechul Sung, Seokhie Hong, Sangjin Lee, Dongjae Lee arXiv ID 2608.06837 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Citations 0 Venue IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, Vol. 2026, No. 3, pp. 465-488, 2026
Abstract
At ASIACRYPT 2021, Baksi et al. introduced DEFAULT, a block cipher designed to algorithmically resist Differential Fault Attack (DFA), claiming 64-bit DFA security regardless of the number of injected faults. At EUROCRYPT 2022, Nageler et al. demonstrated that DEFAULT's claimed DFA resistance can be broken by applying an information-combining technique. More recently, at ASIACRYPT 2024, Jana et al. improved DFA by searching for differential trails with a single solution. They showed that, for DEFAULT with a simple key schedule, injecting five faults at the fifth-to-last round reduces the key space to one, and for BAKSHEESH, injecting twelve faults at the third-to-last round achieves the same result. In this paper, we propose a new DFA framework that utilizes a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) solver. This framework makes it possible to attack deeper rounds than previously achieved, reducing the number of fault injections required for key recovery. Furthermore, we present a method to determine the most efficient fault injection bit positions by systematically analyzing the input differences from all possible single bit-flip faults, thereby further reducing the required number of faults. This systematic analysis has the significant advantage of allowing us to theoretically calculate the required number of faults. Applying our framework, for DEFAULT, injecting three faults at the sixth-to-last round and two faults at the seventh- and eighth-to-last rounds reduces the key space to one.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Cryptography & Security