Linear Matrix Inequalities for Physically-Consistent Inertial Parameter Identification: A Statistical Perspective on the Mass Distribution

January 16, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Patrick M. Wensing, Sangbae Kim, Jean-Jacques Slotine arXiv ID 1701.04395 Category cs.RO: Robotics Citations 142 Venue IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
With the increased application of model-based whole-body control in legged robots, there has been a resurgence of research interest into methods for accurate system identification. An important class of methods focuses on the inertial parameters of rigid-body systems. These parameters consist of the mass, first mass moment (related to center of mass location), and rotational inertia matrix of each link. The main contribution of this paper is to formulate physical-consistency constraints on these parameters as Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMIs). The use of these constraints in identification can accelerate convergence and increase robustness to noisy data. It is critically observed that the proposed LMIs are expressed in terms of the covariance of the mass distribution, rather than its rotational moments of inertia. With this perspective, connections to the classical problem of moments in mathematics are shown to yield new bounding-volume constraints on the mass distribution of each link. While previous work ensured physical plausibility or used convex optimization in identification, the LMIs here uniquely enable both advantages. Constraints are applied to identification of a leg for the MIT Cheetah 3 robot. Detailed properties of transmission components are identified alongside link inertias, with parameter optimization carried out to global optimality through semidefinite programming.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Robotics

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted