A Comparison of Visualisation Methods for Disambiguating Verbal Requests in Human-Robot Interaction

January 26, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Elena Sibirtseva, Dimosthenis Kontogiorgos, Olov Nykvist, Hakan Karaoguz, Iolanda Leite, Joakim Gustafson, Danica Kragic arXiv ID 1801.08760 Category cs.RO: Robotics Cross-listed cs.HC Citations 38 Venue IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Picking up objects requested by a human user is a common task in human-robot interaction. When multiple objects match the user's verbal description, the robot needs to clarify which object the user is referring to before executing the action. Previous research has focused on perceiving user's multimodal behaviour to complement verbal commands or minimising the number of follow up questions to reduce task time. In this paper, we propose a system for reference disambiguation based on visualisation and compare three methods to disambiguate natural language instructions. In a controlled experiment with a YuMi robot, we investigated real-time augmentations of the workspace in three conditions -- mixed reality, augmented reality, and a monitor as the baseline -- using objective measures such as time and accuracy, and subjective measures like engagement, immersion, and display interference. Significant differences were found in accuracy and engagement between the conditions, but no differences were found in task time. Despite the higher error rates in the mixed reality condition, participants found that modality more engaging than the other two, but overall showed preference for the augmented reality condition over the monitor and mixed reality conditions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Robotics

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted