Generating Plans that Predict Themselves

February 14, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Workshop on the Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jaime F. Fisac, Chang Liu, Jessica B. Hamrick, S. Shankar Sastry, J. Karl Hedrick, Thomas L. Griffiths, Anca D. Dragan arXiv ID 1802.05250 Category cs.RO: Robotics Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 32 Venue Workshop on the Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Collaboration requires coordination, and we coordinate by anticipating our teammates' future actions and adapting to their plan. In some cases, our teammates' actions early on can give us a clear idea of what the remainder of their plan is, i.e. what action sequence we should expect. In others, they might leave us less confident, or even lead us to the wrong conclusion. Our goal is for robot actions to fall in the first category: we want to enable robots to select their actions in such a way that human collaborators can easily use them to correctly anticipate what will follow. While previous work has focused on finding initial plans that convey a set goal, here we focus on finding two portions of a plan such that the initial portion conveys the final one. We introduce $t$-\ACty{}: a measure that quantifies the accuracy and confidence with which human observers can predict the remaining robot plan from the overall task goal and the observed initial $t$ actions in the plan. We contribute a method for generating $t$-predictable plans: we search for a full plan that accomplishes the task, but in which the first $t$ actions make it as easy as possible to infer the remaining ones. The result is often different from the most efficient plan, in which the initial actions might leave a lot of ambiguity as to how the task will be completed. Through an online experiment and an in-person user study with physical robots, we find that our approach outperforms a traditional efficiency-based planner in objective and subjective collaboration metrics.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Robotics

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted